rwc_non_lf_results->multi_rw, rwc_lf_results->multi_rw, and rwc_perf_results->multi_rw are accessed at indexes [0..NUM_TEST-1][0..1][0..NUMTEST-1]. Currently the first index overflows the array size in struct rwc_perf.
Fixes: c7eb0972e74b ("test/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c") Cc: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thak...@arm.com> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com> --- app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf_perf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf_perf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf_perf.c index 8120cf43be..32f9ec9250 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf_perf.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf_perf.c @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct rwc_perf { uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_nsp[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_sp[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_miss[2][NUM_TEST]; - uint32_t multi_rw[NUM_TEST - 1][2][NUM_TEST]; + uint32_t multi_rw[NUM_TEST][2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t writer_add_del[NUM_TEST]; }; -- 2.36.1