> -----Original Message----- > From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 8:32 AM > To: Xu, HuilongX; Zoltan Kiss; Ananyev, Konstantin; dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Cao, Waterman; Cao, Min; Zhang, Helin > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones > > Hi Huilong, > > On 05/07/2015 03:57 AM, Xu, HuilongX wrote: > > Hi Olivier, > > Today I find a compile error, when I test ip fragment on dpdk.org. would > > you check this? thanks a lot. > > My dpdk.org commit: a6d71fa7146cc04320c2485d6dde44c1d888d652 > > The compile error as below: > > CC main.o > > /root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c: In function 'init_mem': > > /root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c:748:8: error: 'MBUF_DATA_SIZE' > > undeclared (first use in this function) > > 0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, socket); > > ^ > > /root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c:748:8: note: each undeclared > > identifier is reported only once for each function it > appears in > > Sure, I'll have a look. Thanks for reporting.
Looks like a typo here. Should be fixed by http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-April/017119.html. Konstantin > > Regards, > Olivier > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > huilong > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss > > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 6:39 PM > > To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Olivier Matz; dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones > > > > Hi, > > > > On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM > >>> To: dev at dpdk.org > >>> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin; zoltan.kiss at linaro.org; Richardson, Bruce; > >>> nhorman at tuxdriver.com; olivier.matz at 6wind.com > >>> Subject: [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones > >>> > >>> The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect > >>> mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also > >>> removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on > >>> direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements > >>> and fixes in the mbuf area that makes the implementation of the > >>> last patches easier. > >>> > >> > >> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com> > > > > When does this series get merged? > > > > Regards, > > > > Zoltan > >