Jiayu, please could you review this patch?
08/06/2022 11:57, Kumara Parameshwaran:
> From: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparames...@gmail.com>
>
> A packet with RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG(0x300) contains both RTE_PTYPE_L4_TCP
> (0x100) & RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP (0x200). A fragmented packet as defined in
> rte_mbuf_ptype.h cannot be recognized as other L4 types and hence the
> GRO layer should not use IS_IPV4_TCP_PKT or IS_IPV4_UDP_PKT for
> RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG. Hence, if the packet type is RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG the
> ip header should be parsed to recognize the appropriate IP type and
> invoke the respective gro handler.
>
> Fixes: 1ca5e6740852 ("gro: support UDP/IPv4")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparames...@gmail.com>
> ---
> v1:
> * Introduce IS_IPV4_FRAGMENT macro to check if fragmented packet and
> if true extract the IP header to identify the protocol type and
> invoke the appropriate gro handler. This is done for both
> rte_gro_reassemble and rte_gro_reassemble_burst APIs.
> v2,v3,v4:
> * Fix extra whitespace and column limit warnings
>
> lib/gro/rte_gro.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> lib/gro/rte_gro.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/gro/rte_gro.c b/lib/gro/rte_gro.c
> index 6f7dd4d709..83d6e21dbb 100644
> --- a/lib/gro/rte_gro.c
> +++ b/lib/gro/rte_gro.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ static gro_tbl_pkt_count_fn
> tbl_pkt_count_fn[RTE_GRO_TYPE_MAX_NUM] = {
> ((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP) == RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP) && \
> (RTE_ETH_IS_TUNNEL_PKT(ptype) == 0))
>
> +#define IS_IPV4_FRAGMENT(ptype) (RTE_ETH_IS_IPV4_HDR(ptype) && \
> + ((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG) == RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG))
> +
> #define IS_IPV4_VXLAN_TCP4_PKT(ptype) (RTE_ETH_IS_IPV4_HDR(ptype) && \
> ((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP) == RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP) && \
> ((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_VXLAN) == \
> @@ -240,7 +243,28 @@ rte_gro_reassemble_burst(struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
> * The timestamp is ignored, since all packets
> * will be flushed from the tables.
> */
> - if (IS_IPV4_VXLAN_TCP4_PKT(pkts[i]->packet_type) &&
> + if (IS_IPV4_FRAGMENT(pkts[i]->packet_type)) {
> + struct rte_ipv4_hdr ip4h_copy;
> + const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ip4h =
> rte_pktmbuf_read(pkts[i], pkts[i]->l2_len,
> +
> sizeof(*ip4h), &ip4h_copy);
> + if (ip4h->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_UDP && do_udp4_gro) {
> + ret = gro_udp4_reassemble(pkts[i],
> + &udp_tbl, 0);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + nb_after_gro--;
> + else if (ret < 0)
> + unprocess_pkts[unprocess_num++] =
> pkts[i];
> + } else if (ip4h->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_TCP &&
> do_tcp4_gro) {
> + ret = gro_tcp4_reassemble(pkts[i],
> + &tcp_tbl, 0);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + nb_after_gro--;
> + else if (ret < 0)
> + unprocess_pkts[unprocess_num++] =
> pkts[i];
> + } else {
> + unprocess_pkts[unprocess_num++] = pkts[i];
> + }
> + } else if (IS_IPV4_VXLAN_TCP4_PKT(pkts[i]->packet_type) &&
> do_vxlan_tcp_gro) {
> ret = gro_vxlan_tcp4_reassemble(pkts[i],
> &vxlan_tcp_tbl, 0);
> @@ -349,7 +373,22 @@ rte_gro_reassemble(struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
> current_time = rte_rdtsc();
>
> for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
> - if (IS_IPV4_VXLAN_TCP4_PKT(pkts[i]->packet_type) &&
> + if (IS_IPV4_FRAGMENT(pkts[i]->packet_type)) {
> + struct rte_ipv4_hdr ip4h_copy;
> + const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ip4h =
> rte_pktmbuf_read(pkts[i], pkts[i]->l2_len,
> +
> sizeof(*ip4h), &ip4h_copy);
> + if (ip4h->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_UDP && do_udp4_gro) {
> + if (gro_udp4_reassemble(pkts[i], udp_tbl,
> + current_time) < 0)
> + unprocess_pkts[unprocess_num++] =
> pkts[i];
> + } else if (ip4h->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_TCP &&
> do_tcp4_gro) {
> + if (gro_tcp4_reassemble(pkts[i], tcp_tbl,
> + current_time) < 0)
> + unprocess_pkts[unprocess_num++] =
> pkts[i];
> + } else {
> + unprocess_pkts[unprocess_num++] = pkts[i];
> + }
> + } else if (IS_IPV4_VXLAN_TCP4_PKT(pkts[i]->packet_type) &&
> do_vxlan_tcp_gro) {
> if (gro_vxlan_tcp4_reassemble(pkts[i], vxlan_tcp_tbl,
> current_time) < 0)
>
