I agree that this is great to see a real example of this On Fri, 15 May 2015 14:08:52 +0800 Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu at intel.com> wrote:
> +static unsigned > +check_ports_num(unsigned nb_ports) > +{ > + unsigned valid_nb_ports = nb_ports; > + unsigned portid; > + > + if (nb_ports > nb_ports) { > + RTE_LOG(INFO, VHOST_PORT, "\nSpecified port number(%u) exceeds > total system port number(%u)\n", > + nb_ports, nb_ports); > + nb_ports = nb_ports; This looks repetative, and wrong, is it something to shut up a compiler warning? or something that happened as result of global replace?