> -----Original Message----- > From: Ferruh Yigit <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 18:48 > To: Guo, Junfeng <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z > <[email protected]>; Wu, Jingjing <[email protected]>; Xing, > Beilei <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Li, Xiaoyun <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; Richardson, Bruce > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Xia, Chenbo <[email protected]>; > Zhang, Helin <[email protected]>; Wang, Haiyue > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/8] net/gve/base: introduce base code > > On 10/24/2022 6:04 AM, Guo, Junfeng wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ferruh Yigit <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 17:49 > >> To: Guo, Junfeng <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z > >> <[email protected]>; Wu, Jingjing <[email protected]>; Xing, > >> Beilei <[email protected]> > >> Cc: [email protected]; Li, Xiaoyun <[email protected]>; > >> [email protected]; Richardson, Bruce > >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > >> [email protected]; Xia, Chenbo <[email protected]>; > >> Zhang, Helin <[email protected]>; Wang, Haiyue > >> <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/8] net/gve/base: introduce base code > >> > >> On 10/21/2022 10:19 AM, Junfeng Guo wrote: > >>> The following base code is based on Google Virtual Ethernet (gve) > >>> driver v1.3.0 under MIT license. > >>> - gve_adminq.c > >>> - gve_adminq.h > >>> - gve_desc.h > >>> - gve_desc_dqo.h > >>> - gve_register.h > >>> - gve.h > >>> > >>> The original code is in: > >>> https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet- > >> linux/\ > >>> tree/v1.3.0/google/gve > >>> > >>> Note that these code are not Intel files and they come from the > kernel > >>> community. The base code there has the statement of > >>> SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT). Here we just follow the > >>> required MIT license as an exception to DPDK. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyun Li <[email protected]> > >>> Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang <[email protected]> > >>> Signed-off-by: Junfeng Guo <[email protected]> > >> > >> <...> > >> > >>> +static bool gve_adminq_wait_for_cmd(struct gve_priv *priv, u32 > >> prod_cnt) > >>> +{ > >>> + int i; > >>> + > >>> + for (i = 0; i < GVE_MAX_ADMINQ_EVENT_COUNTER_CHECK; i++) > >> { > >>> + if (ioread32be(&priv->reg_bar0->adminq_event_counter) > >>> + == prod_cnt) > >> > >> [copy/paste from previous version] > >> > >> Syntax, why not move second half of the equation in above line? > >> Unless this is coming from google code and updating it brings > >> maintanance cost. > > > > Yes, this function is just coming from google code without changes. > > So it would be better to keep this unchanged. Thanks! > > > > ack
Thanks for your review!

