On 10/18/22 17:50, Yuan Wang wrote:
The "show config rxhdrs" cmd displays the configured protocol headers
that are used for protocol-based buffer split.
However, it shows "inner-ipv6" as "inner-ipv4".
This patch fixes that by adjusting the order of condition judgments.
Fixes: 52e2e7edcf48 ("app/testpmd: add protocol-based buffer split")
Signed-off-by: Yuan Wang <yuanx.w...@intel.com>
Tested-by: Yaqi Tang <yaqi.t...@intel.com>
---
v2: add fixline.
---
app/test-pmd/config.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index 0f7dbd698f..82fbbc9944 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -4937,15 +4937,6 @@ static const char *get_ptype_str(uint32_t ptype)
else if ((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER) == RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER)
return "eth";
- else if ((ptype & (RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN | RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L4_TCP)) ==
- (RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN | RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L4_TCP))
I realize that the patch solves the problem, but it is still
wrong. Why are RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN and
RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L4_TCP used as masks instead of
RTE_PTYPE_L3_MASK and RTE_PTYPE_L4_MASK?
It is simply incorrect from the very beginning and all
conditions must be fixed to use appropriate masks instead.
