Hi all,
This patch shows a couple of failures in patchwork. I checked it and it is not 
related to the patch. 
It shows as service_autotest failure.
Anybody know how to fix this?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kamalakshitha Aligeri <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2023 10:11 AM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <[email protected]>; Ruifeng Wang
> <[email protected]>; Feifei Wang <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; nd <[email protected]>; Kamalakshitha Aligeri
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH v10 2/2] net/i40e: replace put function
> 
> Integrated zero-copy put API in mempool cache in i40e PMD.
> On Ampere Altra server, l3fwd single core's performance improves by 5%
> with the new API
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kamalakshitha Aligeri <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Feifei Wang <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Morten Brørup <[email protected]>
> ---
> v3:
> Fixed the way mbufs are accessed from txep (Morten Brorup)
> v2:
> Fixed the code for n > RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE (Morten Brorup)
> v1:
> 1. Integrated the zc_put API in i40e PMD 2. Added mempool test cases with
> the zero-cpoy API's
> 
> .mailmap                                |  1 +
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> ---
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap
> index a9f4f28fba..2581d0efe7 100644
> --- a/.mailmap
> +++ b/.mailmap
> @@ -677,6 +677,7 @@ Kai Ji <[email protected]>  Kaiwen Deng
> <[email protected]>  Kalesh AP <kalesh-
> [email protected]>
>  Kamalakannan R <[email protected]>
> +Kamalakshitha Aligeri <[email protected]>
>  Kamil Bednarczyk <[email protected]>  Kamil Chalupnik
> <[email protected]>  Kamil Rytarowski
> <[email protected]>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
> index fe1a6ec75e..35cdb31b2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
> @@ -95,18 +95,35 @@ i40e_tx_free_bufs(struct i40e_tx_queue *txq)
> 
>       n = txq->tx_rs_thresh;
> 
> -      /* first buffer to free from S/W ring is at index
> -       * tx_next_dd - (tx_rs_thresh-1)
> -       */
> +     /* first buffer to free from S/W ring is at index
> +      * tx_next_dd - (tx_rs_thresh-1)
> +      */
>       txep = &txq->sw_ring[txq->tx_next_dd - (n - 1)];
> 
>       if (txq->offloads & RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE) {
> +             struct rte_mempool *mp = txep[0].mbuf->pool;
> +             struct rte_mempool_cache *cache =
> rte_mempool_default_cache(mp, rte_lcore_id());
> +             void **cache_objs;
> +
> +             if (unlikely(!cache))
> +                     goto fallback;
> +
> +             cache_objs = rte_mempool_cache_zc_put_bulk(cache, mp,
> n);
> +             if (unlikely(!cache_objs))
> +                     goto fallback;
> +
>               for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> -                     free[i] = txep[i].mbuf;
> +                     cache_objs[i] = txep[i].mbuf;
>                       /* no need to reset txep[i].mbuf in vector path */
>               }
> -             rte_mempool_put_bulk(free[0]->pool, (void **)free, n);
>               goto done;
> +
> +fallback:
> +             for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
> +                     free[i] = txep[i].mbuf;
> +             rte_mempool_generic_put(mp, (void **)free, n, cache);
> +             goto done;
> +
>       }
> 
>       m = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[0].mbuf);
> --
> 2.25.1

Reply via email to