07/02/2023 16:49, Srikanth Yalavarthi:
> - ml_err("error_code = 0x%016lx, error_message = %s\n",
> error.errcode,
> + ml_err("error_code = 0x%" PRIx64 ", error_message =
> %s\n", error.errcode,
> error.message);
> }
> req = (struct ml_request *)op->user_ptr;
> @@ -334,10 +334,10 @@ ml_request_initialize(struct rte_mempool *mp, void
> *opaque, void *obj, unsigned
> RTE_SET_USED(mp);
> RTE_SET_USED(obj_idx);
>
> - req->input = RTE_PTR_ADD(
> - obj, RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(sizeof(struct ml_request),
> t->cmn.dev_info.min_align_size));
> - req->output = RTE_PTR_ADD(req->input,
> RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(t->model[t->fid].inp_qsize,
> -
> t->cmn.dev_info.min_align_size));
> + req->input = (uint8_t *)obj +
> + RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(sizeof(struct ml_request),
> t->cmn.dev_info.min_align_size);
> + req->output = req->input +
> + RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(t->model[t->fid].inp_qsize,
> t->cmn.dev_info.min_align_size);
> req->niters = 0;
>
> /* quantize data */
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ ml_inference_iomem_setup(struct ml_test *test, struct
> ml_options *opt, uint16_t
> }
>
> t->model[fid].input = mz->addr;
> - t->model[fid].output = RTE_PTR_ADD(t->model[fid].input,
> t->model[fid].inp_dsize);
> + t->model[fid].output = t->model[fid].input + t->model[fid].inp_dsize;
So you are fixing your previous patch in an unrelated patch?
Really I cannot merge this mess in this state.
Please provide cleaner patches in v5.
