Hi, The issue has been resolved when I patched new code from dpdk 22.12, my dpdk version is 19.11
Index: rte_eth_af_packet.c =================================================================== --- rte_eth_af_packet.c (版本 44115) +++ rte_eth_af_packet.c (版本 44128) @@ -169,6 +169,29 @@ } /* + * Check if there is an available frame in the ring + */ +static inline int +tx_ring_status_available(uint32_t tp_status) +{ + /* + * We eliminate the timestamp status from the packet status. + * This should only matter if timestamping is enabled on the socket, + * but there is a bug in the kernel which is fixed in newer releases. + * + * See the following kernel commit for reference: + * commit 171c3b151118a2fe0fc1e2a9d1b5a1570cfe82d2 + * net: packetmmap: fix only tx timestamp on request + */ + tp_status &= ~(TP_STATUS_TS_SOFTWARE | TP_STATUS_TS_RAW_HARDWARE); + + if (tp_status == TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE) + return 1; + + return 0; +} + +/* * Callback to handle sending packets through a real NIC. */ static uint16_t @@ -213,7 +236,7 @@ } /* point at the next incoming frame */ - if (ppd->tp_status != TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE) { + if (!tx_ring_status_available(ppd->tp_status)) { if (poll(&pfd, 1, -1) < 0) break; @@ -236,7 +259,7 @@ * * This results in poll() returning POLLOUT. */ - if (ppd->tp_status != TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE) + if (!tx_ring_status_available(ppd->tp_status)) break; /* copy the tx frame data */ Thanks, Haifeng -----邮件原件----- 发件人: h...@netitest.com <h...@netitest.com> 发送时间: 2023年3月20日 11:32 收件人: 'dev@dpdk.org' <dev@dpdk.org> 主题: af_packet can't send packet more than framecnt Hi, I used af_packet interface, but found only can send packets successfully less than framecnt argument. E.g. if I pass “--vdev=eth_af_packet0,iface=tap0,blocksz=4096,framesz=2048, framecnt=512,qpairs=1,qdisc_bypass=0” to DPDK, the rte_eth_tx_burst only return 1 for 512 times, after that it always return 0. If I pass “--vdev=eth_af_packet0,iface=tap0,blocksz=4096,framesz=2048,framecnt=1024,q pairs=1,qdisc_bypass=0” to DPDK, the rte_eth_tx_burst only return 1 for 1024 times, after that it always return 0. BTW, I use busy loop mode in project, Is there any help for this? Thanks so much Haifeng