I want to highlight that we wish to keep license changes separate from this patch (probably for 23.11). This patch is to simply support basic structures for the DQO data path.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Rushil Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for the confusion. I was talking about the same patch (titled > net/gve: update copyright holders); however, I am not able to find it on > patchwork. > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 9:03 AM Ferruh Yigit <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 4/12/2023 4:42 PM, Rushil Gupta wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:41 AM Guo, Junfeng <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Ferruh Yigit <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 17:35 >> > > To: Guo, Junfeng <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>; Richardson, Bruce >> > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > > Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z >> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; Rushil Gupta >> > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base code for DQO >> > > >> > > On 4/12/2023 10:09 AM, Guo, Junfeng wrote: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- >> > > >> From: Ferruh Yigit <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 16:50 >> > > >> To: Guo, Junfeng <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>; Richardson, Bruce >> > > >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >> >> >> > > >> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z >> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; Rushil Gupta >> > > >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base code for DQO >> > > >> >> > > >> On 4/11/2023 7:51 AM, Guo, Junfeng wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> Hi Junfeng, message moved down. >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> -----Original Message----- >> > > >>>> From: Rushil Gupta <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 12:59 >> > > >>>> To: Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]> >> > > >>>> Cc: Richardson, Bruce <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>; >> > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; >> > > >>>> Rushil Gupta <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>; Guo, Junfeng >> > > >>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > > >>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base code for DQO >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Update gve base code to support DQO. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> This patch is based on this: >> > > >>>> >> > > >> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=27647&state=* >> > <https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=27647&state=* >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Rushil Gupta <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Junfeng Guo <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > > >>> Hi Ferruh & Bruce, >> > > >>> >> > > >>> This patch contains few lines change for the MIT licensed gve >> base >> > > code. >> > > >>> Note that there is no new files added, just some minor code >> > update. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Do we need to ask for special approval from the Tech Board for >> > this? >> > > >>> Please help give some advice and also help review this patch. >> > Thanks! >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >> Once the MIT license exception is in place, as far as I know no >> > more >> > > >> approval is required per change. >> > > > >> > > > Got it, thanks the comment! >> > > > >> > > > Then we may also need your help to review, as well as the coming >> > patch >> > > > set for GVE PMD enhancement for DPDK 23.07. Thanks in advance! >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> BTW, Google will also help replace all the base code under MIT >> > > license >> > > >>> with the ones under BSD-3 license soon, which would make >> things >> > > more >> > > >>> easier. >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >> Is this different from base code under DPDK is changing license >> > [1] ? >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> [1] >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=27570&state=%2A&ar < >> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=27570&state=%2A&ar> >> > > >> chive=both >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > The patch set of the above link only contains the processing of >> > replace >> > > the >> > > > MIT licensed base code with the BSD-3 licensed base code. After >> some >> > > > discussion, we think Google is in the right place to do that >> > work. And >> > > they >> > > > are working on that now. >> > > > >> > > >> > > Is the Google GVE driver [2] in the process of changing license >> > from MIT >> > > to BSD-3? >> > > >> > > >> > > [2] >> > > https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet- >> > <https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet-> >> > > linux/tree/v1.3.0/google/gve >> > > >> > >> > I'm not sure, I don't know much about Google's plans. >> > Maybe they could provide some info here. Thanks! >> > >> > @Rushil Gupta >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > This patch is mainly for the feature upstreaming of DPDK 23.07. >> It >> > > contains >> > > > only the code part, following previous license statements, >> > without any >> > > > license change. >> > > > >> > > > This patch is separated and sent by Google, to ensure there is >> > no license >> > > > violation. >> > > > >> > > > BTW, about the feature of GVE PMD enhancement, the rest code >> are all >> > > > about BSD-3 licensed files, and that patch set will be sent out >> > soon. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks! >> > >> > I have got the green light internally to switch to BSD-3 license for >> > code under base directory. If it is ok with the tech board, I can send a >> > patch right away with all of the base files changed to BSD-3 which can >> > be merged after this patch. Please let me know what you think. >> > We are also about to upstream driver >> > code: >> https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet-freebsd < >> https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet-freebsd> >> to FreeBSD as well so you will see similar code under BSD license soon in >> freebsd repo. >> >> >> +techboard >> >> There is already a patch [1] to change dpdk gve driver license from MIT >> to BSD-3, what will be different in the patch you are planning to send? >> >> Or overall I am trying to understand what is this new development on top >> of existing patch. >> >> >> >> >> >>
