> -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2023 6:11 PM > To: Xu, HailinX <hailinx...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org > Cc: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John > <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; Xu, Qian Q > <qian.q...@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Peng, > Yuan <yuan.p...@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.c...@intel.com>; > dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: 21.11.4 patches review and test > > On 04/05/2023 03:13, Xu, HailinX wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:35 PM > >> To: Xu, HailinX <hailinx...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org > >> Cc: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John > >> <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; Xu, Qian > >> Q <qian.q...@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; > Peng, > >> Yuan <yuan.p...@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.c...@intel.com>; > >> dev@dpdk.org > >> Subject: Re: 21.11.4 patches review and test > >> > >> On 20/04/2023 11:32, Kevin Traynor wrote: > >>> On 20/04/2023 03:40, Xu, HailinX wrote: > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Xu, HailinX <hailinx...@intel.com> > >>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 2:13 PM > >>>>> To: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; sta...@dpdk.org > >>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe > >> <abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>; > >>>>> Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin > >>>>> <benjamin.wal...@intel.com>; David Christensen > >>>>> <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal > >> <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; > >>>>> Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob > >>>>> <jer...@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; > >>>>> Ju-Hyoung Lee <juh...@microsoft.com>; Luca Boccassi > >>>>> <bl...@debian.org>; Pei Zhang <pezh...@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q > >>>>> <qian.q...@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>; > >> Thomas > >>>>> Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; yangh...@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan > >>>>> <yuan.p...@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.c...@intel.com> > >>>>> Subject: RE: 21.11.4 patches review and test > >>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> > >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 7:38 PM > >>>>>> To: sta...@dpdk.org > >>>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe > >>>>>> <abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>; Ali Alnubani > >>>>>> <alia...@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin > >>>>>> <benjamin.wal...@intel.com>; David Christensen > >>>>>> <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal > >>>>>> <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; > >>>>>> Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John > >>>>>> <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee > <juh...@microsoft.com>; > >>>>>> Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi > >>>>>> <bl...@debian.org>; Pei Zhang <pezh...@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q > >>>>>> <qian.q...@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>; > >>>>> Thomas > >>>>>> Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; yangh...@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan > >>>>>> <yuan.p...@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.c...@intel.com> > >>>>>> Subject: 21.11.4 patches review and test > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.4. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The planned date for the final release is 25th April. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and > >>>>>> report any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the > >>>>>> final release the fixes and reported validations will be added to > >>>>>> the > >> release notes. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> A release candidate tarball can be found at: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.4-rc1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > >>>>>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Kevin > >>>>> > >>>>> HI All, > >>>>> > >>>>> Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.4-rc1 > >>>>> validation test rate is 85%. No critical issue is found. > >>>>> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. > >>>>> New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues > >>>>> 1. > >> pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: > >>>>> performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets > >>>>> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 -- no fix yet > >>>>> 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under > >> investigating > >>>>> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > >>>>> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with > >>>>> latest GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as > >>>>> Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, > >>>>> RHEL8.4, FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc. > >>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>>> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > >>>>> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > >>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>>> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > >>>>> VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > >>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>>> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package > >>>>> Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced > RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible > >>>>> Descriptor, etc. > >>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>>> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including > >>>>> PF/VF single core performance test, etc. > >>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>>> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library > >>>>> basic test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. > >>>>> - On going. > >>>>> > >>>>> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing > >>>>> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as > >>>>> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf > >>>>> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. > >>>>> - All test done. found bug1. > >>>>> * Cryptodev: > >>>>> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API > >>>>> testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. > >>>>> - Execution rate is 90%. found bug2. > >>>>> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput > >>>>> Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. > >>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Xu, Hailin > >>>> Update the test status for Intel part. completed dpdk21.11.4-rc1 > >>>> all > >> validation. No critical issue is found. > >>> > >>> Hi. Thanks for testing. > >>> > >>>> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. > >>>> New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues > >>>> 1. > >> pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: > >> performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets > >>>> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 --not fix yet, Only > >>>> the specified platform exists > >>> > >>> Do you know which patch caaused the regression? I'm not fully clear > >>> from the Bz for 20.11. The backported patch ID'd as root cause [0] > >>> in > >>> 20.11 is in the previous releases of 20.11 (and 21.11). > >>> > >>> Trying to understand because then it would have shown in testing for > >>> previous releases. Or is this a new test introduced for latest LTS > >>> releases? and if so, what is the baseline performance based on? > >>> > >>> [0] > >>> commit 1c9a7fba5c90e0422b517404499ed106f647bcff > >>> Author: Mattias Rönnblom <mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com> > >>> Date: Mon Jul 11 14:11:32 2022 +0200 > >>> > >>> net: accept unaligned data in checksum routines > >>> > >>>> 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under > >>>> investigating > >>> > >>> ok, thank you. > >>> > >> > >> Hi, it was mentioned in a separate mail that the performance drop > >> issue was not the same as 20.11. > >> > >> Is there any update on that and the failing virtio tests ? Is there a > >> regression introduced since in 21.11.4 ? > > > > Found bad commit id: > > commit c41493361c87e730459ead9311c68528eb0874aa > > Author: Boleslav Stankevich <boleslav.stankev...@oktetlabs.ru> > > Date: Fri Mar 3 14:19:29 2023 +0300 > > net/virtio: deduce IP length for TSO checksum > > > > We try this issue on 3 different platforms Performance drop only found > > on Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8280M CPU @ 2.70GHz CPU. > > > > Ok, thanks for reporting. This commit was also in 23.03 and 20.11.8 so not > sure > if they were tested on this platform? > Yes, But 23.03 doesn't have such issue on the same platform
> This commit fixes a functional issue, so I don't think it should be removed > unless > it is critical issue. > > There's no update on other performance report. Release is already 1 week > overdue, is there critical issues that we should hold release for? > No other issues found Regards, Xu, Hailin > thanks, > Kevin. > > > Regards, > > Xu, Hailin > > > >> > >> thanks, > >> Kevin, > >> > >>> Kevin. > >>> > >>>> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > >>>> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with > >>>> latest > >> GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as > >>>> Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, > >>>> RHEL8.4, > >> FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc. > >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > >> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > >> VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package > >> Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible > >> Descriptor, etc. > >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including > >>>> PF/VF > >> single core performance test, etc. > >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library > >>>> basic test - > >> QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. > >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>> > >>>> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing > >>>> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as > >> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf > >> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. > >>>> - All test done. found bug1. > >>>> * Cryptodev: > >>>> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API > >> testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. > >>>> - All test done. found bug2. > >>>> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput > >> Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. > >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Xu, Hailin > >>>> > >>> > >
