On Thu, 18 May 2023 13:45:29 +0000 Ankur Dwivedi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >-----Original Message----- > >From: Ankur Dwivedi <[email protected]> > >Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 5:35 PM > >To: [email protected] > >Cc: [email protected]; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; > >Ankur Dwivedi <[email protected]> > >Subject: [PATCH v5 1/1] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch > > > >This patch adds a validation in checkpatch tool, to check if a tracepoint is > >present in any new function added in cryptodev, ethdev, eventdev and > >mempool library. > > > >In this patch, the build_map_changes function is copied from check-symbol- > >change.sh to check-tracepoint.sh. The check-tracepoint.sh script uses > >build_map_changes function to create a map of functions. > >In the map, the newly added functions, added in the experimental section are > >identified and their definition are checked for the presence of tracepoint. > >The > >checkpatch return error if the tracepoint is not present. > > > >For functions for which trace is not needed, they can be added to > >devtools/trace-skiplist.txt file. The above tracepoint check will be skipped > >for > >them. > > > >Signed-off-by: Ankur Dwivedi <[email protected]> Given the amount of string processing, it would be more readable in python. That is not a show stopper, just a suggestion.
