On 5/18/2023 8:46 AM, Jiawen Wu wrote:
>> When cleaning up NIC's interrupts, it is possible to add some alarms
>> at the same time. However, if these alarms are not canceled, it may
>> cause use-after-free problems. Therefore, after cleaning up NIC's
>> interrupts, these alarms should also be canceled.
>>
>> Fixes: d3bb4a04eac1 ("net/txgbe: add SFP hotplug identification")
>> Fixes: e0d876ef6bbc ("net/txgbe: support device stop and close")
>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>>
>> Reported-by: Pengfei Sun <sunpengfe...@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunj...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/txgbe/txgbe_ethdev.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/txgbe/txgbe_ethdev.c 
>> b/drivers/net/txgbe/txgbe_ethdev.c
>> index a502618bc5..a3d7461951 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/txgbe/txgbe_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/txgbe/txgbe_ethdev.c
>> @@ -2032,8 +2032,10 @@ txgbe_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>              rte_delay_ms(100);
>>      } while (retries++ < (10 + TXGBE_LINK_UP_TIME));
>>
>> -    /* cancel the delay handler before remove dev */
>> +    /* cancel all alarm handler before remove dev */
>>      rte_eal_alarm_cancel(txgbe_dev_interrupt_delayed_handler, dev);
>> +    rte_eal_alarm_cancel(txgbe_dev_detect_sfp, dev);
>> +    rte_eal_alarm_cancel(txgbe_dev_setup_link_alarm_handler, dev);
>>
>>      /* uninitialize PF if max_vfs not zero */
>>      txgbe_pf_host_uninit(dev);
>> --
>> 2.33.0
>>
>>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jiawen Wu <jiawe...@trustnetic.com>
> 
> 

Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.

Reply via email to