12/04/2023 11:52, Sivaprasad Tummala: > amd-pstate introduces a new CPU frequency control mechanism for AMD > processors using the ACPI Collaborative Performance Power Control > feature for a finer grained frequency management. > > Patch to add support for amd-pstate driver. > > Signed-off-by: Sivaprasad Tummala <sivaprasad.tumm...@amd.com> > --- > app/test/test_power.c | 1 + > app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c | 5 +- > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_07.rst | 3 + > examples/l3fwd-power/main.c | 1 + > lib/power/meson.build | 1 + > lib/power/power_amd_pstate_cpufreq.c | 698 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > lib/power/power_amd_pstate_cpufreq.h | 219 ++++++++ > lib/power/rte_power.c | 26 + > lib/power/rte_power.h | 3 +- > lib/power/rte_power_pmd_mgmt.c | 6 +- > 10 files changed, 958 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
I'm not comfortable to merge this patch without a word from David Hunt. Given there is 0 review, what do we do? > Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin. > ======================================================= > > + * **Added amd-pstate driver support to power management library.** > + > + Added support for amd-pstate driver which works on AMD Zen > processors. Looks like the indent is not correct. > 'power_pstate_cpufreq.c', > + 'power_amd_pstate_cpufreq.c', Can you say briefly why AMD has a different pstate? Does it mean power_pstate_cpufreq.c should be renamed power_intel_pstate_cpufreq.c? > +++ b/lib/power/power_amd_pstate_cpufreq.c > @@ -0,0 +1,698 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause > + * Copyright(c) 2010-2021 Intel Corporation > + * Copyright(c) 2021 Arm Limited Why is there copyright for Intel and Arm? Does it mean you copied some code and did not try to keep common code in a common place? > + * Copyright(c) 2023 Amd Limited
