The sfc_kvargs_process() and sfc_efx_dev_class_get() function could
handle both key=value and only-key, so they should use
rte_kvargs_process_opt() instead of rte_kvargs_process() to parse.

Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengcheng...@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/common/sfc_efx/sfc_efx.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_kvargs.c     | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/sfc_efx.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/sfc_efx.c
index 2dc5545760..3ebac909f1 100644
--- a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/sfc_efx.c
+++ b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/sfc_efx.c
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ sfc_efx_dev_class_get(struct rte_devargs *devargs)
                return dev_class;
 
        if (rte_kvargs_count(kvargs, RTE_DEVARGS_KEY_CLASS) != 0) {
-               rte_kvargs_process(kvargs, RTE_DEVARGS_KEY_CLASS,
-                                  sfc_efx_kvarg_dev_class_handler, &dev_class);
+               rte_kvargs_process_opt(kvargs, RTE_DEVARGS_KEY_CLASS,
+                                      sfc_efx_kvarg_dev_class_handler, 
&dev_class);
        }
 
        rte_kvargs_free(kvargs);
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_kvargs.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_kvargs.c
index 783cb43ae6..24bb896179 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_kvargs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_kvargs.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ sfc_kvargs_process(struct sfc_adapter *sa, const char 
*key_match,
        if (sa->kvargs == NULL)
                return 0;
 
-       return -rte_kvargs_process(sa->kvargs, key_match, handler, opaque_arg);
+       return -rte_kvargs_process_opt(sa->kvargs, key_match, handler, 
opaque_arg);
 }
 
 int
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to