The sfc_kvargs_process() and sfc_efx_dev_class_get() function could handle both key=value and only-key, so they should use rte_kvargs_process_opt() instead of rte_kvargs_process() to parse.
Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengcheng...@huawei.com> --- drivers/common/sfc_efx/sfc_efx.c | 4 ++-- drivers/net/sfc/sfc_kvargs.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/sfc_efx.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/sfc_efx.c index 2dc5545760..3ebac909f1 100644 --- a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/sfc_efx.c +++ b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/sfc_efx.c @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ sfc_efx_dev_class_get(struct rte_devargs *devargs) return dev_class; if (rte_kvargs_count(kvargs, RTE_DEVARGS_KEY_CLASS) != 0) { - rte_kvargs_process(kvargs, RTE_DEVARGS_KEY_CLASS, - sfc_efx_kvarg_dev_class_handler, &dev_class); + rte_kvargs_process_opt(kvargs, RTE_DEVARGS_KEY_CLASS, + sfc_efx_kvarg_dev_class_handler, &dev_class); } rte_kvargs_free(kvargs); diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_kvargs.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_kvargs.c index 783cb43ae6..24bb896179 100644 --- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_kvargs.c +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_kvargs.c @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ sfc_kvargs_process(struct sfc_adapter *sa, const char *key_match, if (sa->kvargs == NULL) return 0; - return -rte_kvargs_process(sa->kvargs, key_match, handler, opaque_arg); + return -rte_kvargs_process_opt(sa->kvargs, key_match, handler, opaque_arg); } int -- 2.17.1