On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:25:12AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-10-20 21:34, Stephen Hemminger: > > Patch backlog is not getting better, now at 486. > > > > How can we break this logjam? > > Do I need to make a new "ready for merge" tree? > > What would mean "ready for merge"? > A lot of patches are acked but do not compile or doc is missing. I would think that many of these patches that don't compile should be marked as rejected in patchwork, and a note sent to the list. If you can enable the patchwork xmlrpc interface, we could script/automate that process
Neil > > I have the feeling it would become easier if there were mailing-list, > patchwork > and git tree dedicated to some areas. What about starting with drivers/net? > >