On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:14:28PM +0100, David Marchand wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:36 PM Tyler Retzlaff > <roret...@linux.microsoft.com> wrote: > > > > Replace some missed zero length arrays not captured in the > > original series. > > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=30410&state=* > > > > Zero length arrays are a GNU extension that has been > > superseded by flex arrays. > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html > > > > v2: > > * added additional patches for fib & pipeline libs. > > series-acks have been placed only against original > > hash and rcu patches. > > There seems to be an issue with the ABI check on those changes. > After a quick chat with Dodji, I opened a bug for libabigail. > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31377
I double checked again and I don't see the struct in question being embedded as a field of another struct/union. So I don't think there should be an ABI change here. I'm okay with the change being merged but if there is concern I can drop this patch from the series. > > > -- > David Marchand
