On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 03:51:49PM +0200, Michal Jastrzebski wrote: > From: Michal Kobylinski <michalx.kobylinski at intel.com> > > Main implementation - changes to lpm library regarding new data types. > Additionally this patch implements changes required by test application. > ABI versioning requirements are met only for lpm library, > for table library it will be sent in v2 of this patch-set. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Kobylinski <michalx.kobylinski at intel.com> > --- > app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c | 4 +- > app/test/test_lpm.c | 227 +++++----- > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c | 887 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h | 295 +++++++++++- > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map | 59 ++- > lib/librte_table/rte_table_lpm.c | 10 +- > 6 files changed, 1322 insertions(+), 160 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c b/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c > index dbecc52..331ab29 100644 > --- a/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c > +++ b/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c > @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static void > lpm_clean(unsigned lcore_id) > { > char lpm_name[MAX_STRING_SIZE]; > - struct rte_lpm *lpm; > + struct rte_lpm_extend *lpm;
I thought this patchset was just to increase the size of the lpm entries, not to create a whole new entry type? The structure names etc. should all stay the same, and let the ABI versionning take care of handling code using the older structures. /Bruce