On 7/16/2024 1:02 PM, Serhii Iliushyk wrote: > diff --git > a/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/core/nt200a0x/clock_profiles/nthw_fpga_clk9563.c > b/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/core/nt200a0x/clock_profiles/nthw_fpga_clk9563.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..a957581bf3 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/core/nt200a0x/clock_profiles/nthw_fpga_clk9563.c > @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ > +/* > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause > + * Copyright(c) 2023 Napatech A/S > + */ > + > +#include "ntnic_mod_reg.h" > + > +/* > + * Clock profile for NT200A02 FPGA 9563 > + */ > +#define si5340_revd_register_t type_9563_si5340_nt200a02_u23_v5 > +#define si5340_revd_registers data_9563_si5340_nt200a02_u23_v5 > +#include "NT200A02_U23_Si5340_adr0_v5-Registers.h" > +#ifdef __cplusplus > +static_assert(sizeof(type_9563_si5340_nt200a02_u23_v5) == > sizeof(clk_profile_data_fmt2_t), > + clk_profile_size_error_msg); > +#endif /* __cplusplus */ >
As project compiled with C11 standard, C supports static assert, keyword by spec is '_Static_assert' but it is aliased to 'static_assert', please check 'rte_common.h', so it should be OK to use 'static_assert' directly without "#ifdef __cplusplus". Or DPDK macro for it is 'RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON', both are OK, up to you.
