Hello, On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 11:56 PM Damodharam Ammepalli <damodharam.ammepa...@broadcom.com> wrote: > @@ -1331,16 +1376,17 @@ static int bnxt_dev_configure_op(struct rte_eth_dev > *eth_dev) > void bnxt_print_link_info(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev) > { > struct rte_eth_link *link = ð_dev->data->dev_link; > + struct bnxt *bp = eth_dev->data->dev_private; > > if (link->link_status) > - PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Port %d Link Up - speed %u Mbps - %s\n", > - eth_dev->data->port_id, > - (uint32_t)link->link_speed, > - (link->link_duplex == RTE_ETH_LINK_FULL_DUPLEX) ? > - ("full-duplex") : ("half-duplex\n")); > + PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Port %d Link Up - speed %u Mbps - %s > Lanes - %d\n", > + eth_dev->data->port_id, > + (uint32_t)link->link_speed, > + (link->link_duplex == RTE_ETH_LINK_FULL_DUPLEX) ? > + ("full-duplex") : ("half-duplex\n"),
A \n slipped in with the "half-duplex" string. Please send a fix against next-net. > + (uint16_t)bp->link_info->active_lanes); > else > - PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "Port %d Link Down\n", > - eth_dev->data->port_id); > + PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "Port %d Link Down\n", > eth_dev->data->port_id); > } > > /* -- David Marchand