Hi Maxime,
Do you want me to send a v2 for this or you can change the comment before
applying?
"Also, take the opportunity to fix some unused VRB2 registers definitions".
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 8:06 AM
> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Vargas, Hernan <hernan.var...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] baseband/acc: FFT support in VRB2 PRQ device
>
> Hi,
>
> On 10/18/24 20:42, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2024 12:54 AM
> >> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Vargas, Hernan
> <hernan.var...@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] baseband/acc: FFT support in VRB2 PRQ
> >> device
> >>
> >> Hi Nicolas,
> >>
> >> On 10/15/24 00:30, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> >>> Supporting recent change in the device to extend FFT capability
> >>> processing in latest stepping.
> >>> Also including cosmetic change to VRB2 register definition.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h | 2 +-
> >>> drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c | 30
> >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> ---
> >>> drivers/baseband/acc/vrb2_vf_enum.h | 4 ++--
> >>> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
> >>> b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
> >>> index 0c249d5b93..4c60b7896b 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
> >>> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
> >>> #define ACC_MAX_FCW_SIZE 128
> >>> #define ACC_IQ_SIZE 4
> >>>
> >>> -#define ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN_3 28
> >>> +#define ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN_VRB2 128
> >>>
> >>> /* Constants from K0 computation from 3GPP 38.212 Table 5.4.2.1-2 */
> >>> #define ACC_N_ZC_1 66 /* N = 66 Zc for BG 1 */ diff --git
> >>> a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> >>> b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> >>> index 0455320c2a..5eb3e8dd48 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> >>> @@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ vrb_queue_setup(struct rte_bbdev *dev,
> >> uint16_t queue_id,
> >>> case RTE_BBDEV_OP_FFT:
> >>> fcw_len = ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN;
> >>> if (q->d->device_variant == VRB2_VARIANT)
> >>> - fcw_len = ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN_3;
> >>> + fcw_len = ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN_VRB2;
> >>> break;
> >>> case RTE_BBDEV_OP_MLDTS:
> >>> fcw_len = ACC_FCW_MLDTS_BLEN;
> >>> @@ -1402,7 +1402,11 @@ vrb_dev_info_get(struct rte_bbdev *dev,
> >>> struct
> >> rte_bbdev_driver_info *dev_info)
> >>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FP16_INPUT
> >> |
> >>>
> >> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FP16_OUTPUT |
> >>>
> >> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_POWER_MEAS |
> >>> -
> >> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_WINDOWING_BYPASS,
> >>> +
> >> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_WINDOWING_BYPASS |
> >>> +
> >> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_TIMING_OFFSET_PER_CS |
> >>> +
> >> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_TIMING_ERROR |
> >>> +
> >> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_DEWINDOWING |
> >>> +
> >> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FREQ_RESAMPLING,
> >>> .num_buffers_src = 1,
> >>> .num_buffers_dst = 1,
> >>> .fft_windows_num = ACC_MAX_FFT_WIN,
> >> @@ -3725,6 +3729,8 @@
> >>> vrb1_fcw_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op, struct acc_fcw_fft *fcw)
> >>> static inline void
> >>> vrb2_fcw_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op, struct acc_fcw_fft_3
> *fcw)
> >>> {
> >>> + uint8_t cs;
> >>> +
> >>> fcw->in_frame_size = op->fft.input_sequence_size;
> >>> fcw->leading_pad_size = op->fft.input_leading_padding;
> >>> fcw->out_frame_size = op->fft.output_sequence_size; @@ -3760,6
> >>> +3766,16 @@ vrb2_fcw_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op, struct
> >> acc_fcw_fft_3 *fcw)
> >>> fcw->bypass = 3;
> >>> else
> >>> fcw->bypass = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + fcw->enable_dewin = check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
> >> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_DEWINDOWING);
> >>> + fcw->freq_resample_mode = op->fft.freq_resample_mode;
> >>> + fcw->depad_output_size = fcw->freq_resample_mode == 0 ?
> >>> + op->fft.output_sequence_size : op-
> >>> fft.output_depadded_size;
> >>> + for (cs = 0; cs < RTE_BBDEV_MAX_CS; cs++) {
> >>> + fcw->cs_theta_0[cs] = op->fft.cs_theta_0[cs];
> >>> + fcw->cs_theta_d[cs] = op->fft.cs_theta_d[cs];
> >>> + fcw->cs_time_offset[cs] = op->fft.time_offset[cs];
> >>> + }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static inline int
> >>> @@ -3782,8 +3798,14 @@ vrb_dma_desc_fft_fill(struct
> rte_bbdev_fft_op
> >> *op,
> >>> /* FCW already done */
> >>> acc_header_init(desc);
> >>>
> >>> - RTE_SET_USED(win_input);
> >>> - RTE_SET_USED(win_offset);
> >>> + if (win_en && win_input) {
> >>> + desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].address =
> >> rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(win_input, *win_offset);
> >>> + desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blen = op->fft.output_depadded_size
> >> * 2;
> >>> + desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blkid = ACC_DMA_BLKID_DEWIN_IN;
> >>> + desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].last = 0;
> >>> + desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].dma_ext = 0;
> >>> + bd_idx++;
> >>> + }
> >>>
> >>> desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].address = rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(input,
> >> *in_offset);
> >>> desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blen = op->fft.input_sequence_size *
> >>> ACC_IQ_SIZE; diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/vrb2_vf_enum.h
> >>> b/drivers/baseband/acc/vrb2_vf_enum.h
> >>> index 9c6e451010..1cc6986c67 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/vrb2_vf_enum.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/vrb2_vf_enum.h
> >>> @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ enum {
> >>> VRB2_VfHiInfoRingIntWrEnVf = 0x00000020,
> >>> VRB2_VfHiInfoRingPf2VfWrEnVf = 0x00000024,
> >>> VRB2_VfHiMsixVectorMapperVf = 0x00000060,
> >>> - VRB2_VfHiDeviceStatus = 0x00000068,
> >>> - VRB2_VfHiInterruptSrc = 0x00000070,
> >>> + VRB2_VfHiDeviceStatus = 0x00000064,
> >>> + VRB2_VfHiInterruptSrc = 0x00000068,
> >>
> >> The offset of the registers change, is that what you describe as
> >> cosmetic change?
> >>
> >> Does it have an impact on older DPDK versions? i.e. should it be
> backported?
> >
> > Hi Maxime, These registers are currently not used in the code so it really
> has no impact.
> > It is more for documentation purpose and in case we need to use them
> > in the future, basically not to carry such discrepancy with specs forward.
> > No actual impact and does not need to be back ported for the same reason.
>
> Ok, then I would suggest to just name things as they are in the commit
> message.
>
> "Also, take the opportunity to fix some unsused VRB2 registers definitions".
>
> Thanks,
> Maxime
>
> > Thanks
> > Nic
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Maxime
> >>
> >>> VRB2_VfDmaFec5GulDescBaseLoRegVf = 0x00000120,
> >>> VRB2_VfDmaFec5GulDescBaseHiRegVf = 0x00000124,
> >>> VRB2_VfDmaFec5GulRespPtrLoRegVf = 0x00000128,
> >
