> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Richardson <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2024 5:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Bruce Richardson <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Naga
> Harish K S V <[email protected]>; Jerin Jacob <[email protected]>;
> Nikhil Rao <[email protected]>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] eventdev: fix possible array underflow/overflow
> 
> If the number of interrupts is zero, then indexing an array by "nb_rx_intr - 
> 1"
> will cause an out-of-bounds write Fix this by putting in a check that 
> nb_rx_intr >
> 0 before doing the array write. Coverity issue: 448870 Fixes: 3810ae435783
> 
> If the number of interrupts is zero, then indexing an array by "nb_rx_intr - 
> 1"
> will cause an out-of-bounds write  Fix this by putting in a check that 
> nb_rx_intr
> > 0 before doing the array write.
> 
> Coverity issue: 448870
> Fixes: 3810ae435783 ("eventdev: add interrupt driven queues to Rx adapter")
> Cc: [email protected]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <[email protected]>
Applied to dpdk-next-eventdev/for-main. Thanks

> ---
>  lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.c
> b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.c
> index 3ee20d95f3..39674c4604 100644
> --- a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.c
> +++ b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.c
> @@ -2299,7 +2299,7 @@ rxa_sw_add(struct event_eth_rx_adapter
> *rx_adapter, uint16_t eth_dev_id,
>                       for (i = 0; i < dev_info->dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++)
>                               dev_info->intr_queue[i] = i;
>               } else {
> -                     if (!rxa_intr_queue(dev_info, rx_queue_id))
> +                     if (!rxa_intr_queue(dev_info, rx_queue_id) &&
> nb_rx_intr > 0)
>                               dev_info->intr_queue[nb_rx_intr - 1] =
>                                       rx_queue_id;
>               }
> --
> 2.43.0

Reply via email to