On Fri,  7 Feb 2025 15:21:45 -0800
lon...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:

> +     /* At least one eth_dev is probed, init shared data */
> +     if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
> +             rte_spinlock_lock(&mana_shared_data_lock);
> +             mana_local_data.primary_cnt++;
> +             rte_spinlock_unlock(&mana_shared_data_lock);
> +     } else {
> +             rte_spinlock_lock(&mana_shared_data_lock);
> +             mana_local_data.secondary_cnt++;
> +             rte_spinlock_unlock(&mana_shared_data_lock);
> +
> +             rte_spinlock_lock(&mana_shared_data->lock);
> +             mana_shared_data->secondary_cnt++;
> +             rte_spinlock_unlock(&mana_shared_data->lock);

If all you are doing is wanting a MP safe counter, use atomic operations
instead of the overhead of a spin lock.

Reply via email to