Hi Thomas, The reason for removing RTE_NEXT_ABI here is caused by sink port, which is not wrapped by RTE_NEXT_ABI macro. If the user disable RTE_NEXT_ABI but enable RTE_PORT_PCAP, the original code will cause the compile error as pcap library is missing.
Regards, Fan On 01/04/2016 14:56, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-04-01 14:41, Fan Zhang: >> --- a/mk/rte.app.mk >> +++ b/mk/rte.app.mk >> @@ -92,9 +92,7 @@ endif >> ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST_USER),n) >> _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST) += -lfuse >> endif >> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_NEXT_ABI),y) >> _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_PORT_PCAP) += -lpcap >> -endif > Why removing NEXT_ABI here? > The pcap port cannot work without it because of > > +#ifdef RTE_NEXT_ABI > + > + /** The full path of the pcap file to read packets from */ > + char *file_name; > + /** The number of bytes to be read from each packet in the > + * pcap file. If this value is 0, the whole packet is read; > + * if it is bigger than packet size, the generated packets > + * will contain the whole packet */ > + uint32_t n_bytes_per_pkt; > + > +#endif >
