19/08/2025 17:24, Stephen Hemminger: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 10:37:27 +0200 > Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > > > 19/08/2025 01:27, Stephen Hemminger: > > > +++ b/lib/eal/include/bsd_queue.h > > > @@ -0,0 +1,1075 @@ > > > +/*- > > > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause > > > + * > > > + * Copyright (c) 1991, 1993 > > > + * The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > > > + * > > > + * This is a copy of sys/queue.h which is used to overcome > > > + * missing parts in the glibc version (and Windows). > > > + */ > > > + > > > +#ifndef _SYS_QUEUE_H_ > > > +#define _SYS_QUEUE_H_ > > > > Shouldn't we rename this include flag? with RTE_ prefix? > > > No, by keeping the same prefix if the user includes both sys/queue.h and > bsd_queue.h > there will be no confilcts.
You mean by checking _SYS_QUEUE_H_ which is the same as sys/queue.h? So if I include sys/queue.h first, I will have a limited version. It means we should not include it before any DPDK include. It looks like a limitation for DPDK users.
