On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 02:54:52PM +0200, Shetty, Praveen wrote:
> From: Praveen Shetty <[email protected]>
> 
> This patch adds the registration support for a new vCPF PMD.
> vCPF PMD is responsible for enabling control and data path
> functionality for the CPF VF devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Praveen Shetty <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Atul Patel  <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Dhananjay Shukla <[email protected]>
> ---

A few minor comments inline below.

/Bruce

>  drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c        | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.h        |  1 +
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.c |  4 ++--
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.h |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c 
> b/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
> index 6d7b23ad7a..d6227c99b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
> @@ -1854,6 +1854,7 @@ cpfl_handle_virtchnl_msg(struct cpfl_adapter_ext 
> *adapter)
>  
>               switch (mbx_op) {
>               case idpf_mbq_opc_send_msg_to_peer_pf:
> +             case idpf_mbq_opc_send_msg_to_peer_drv:
>                       if (vc_op == VIRTCHNL2_OP_EVENT) {
>                               cpfl_handle_vchnl_event_msg(adapter, 
> adapter->base.mbx_resp,
>                                                           ctlq_msg.data_len);
> @@ -2610,6 +2611,11 @@ static const struct rte_pci_id pci_id_cpfl_map[] = {
>       { .vendor_id = 0, /* sentinel */ },
>  };
>  
> +static const struct rte_pci_id pci_id_vcpf_map[] = {
> +     { RTE_PCI_DEVICE(IDPF_INTEL_VENDOR_ID, IXD_DEV_ID_VCPF) },
> +     { .vendor_id = 0, /* sentinel */ },
> +};
> +
>  static struct cpfl_adapter_ext *
>  cpfl_find_adapter_ext(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev)
>  {
> @@ -2866,6 +2872,14 @@ static struct rte_pci_driver rte_cpfl_pmd = {
>       .remove         = cpfl_pci_remove,
>  };
>  
> +static struct rte_pci_driver rte_vcpf_pmd = {
> +     .id_table       = pci_id_vcpf_map,
> +     .drv_flags      = RTE_PCI_DRV_NEED_MAPPING |
> +                       RTE_PCI_DRV_PROBE_AGAIN,
> +     .probe          = cpfl_pci_probe,
> +     .remove         = cpfl_pci_remove,
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * Driver initialization routine.
>   * Invoked once at EAL init time.
> @@ -2874,6 +2888,9 @@ static struct rte_pci_driver rte_cpfl_pmd = {
>  RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI(net_cpfl, rte_cpfl_pmd);
>  RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE(net_cpfl, pci_id_cpfl_map);
>  RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP(net_cpfl, "* igb_uio | vfio-pci");
> +RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI(net_vcpf, rte_vcpf_pmd);
> +RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE(net_vcpf, pci_id_vcpf_map);
> +RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP(net_vcpf, "* igb_uio | vfio-pci");

Minor question - do you know if this works with uio_pci_generic, or has it
been tested? With igb_uio largely unmaintained right now, the in-tree uio
would be good to be able to recommend if vfio is not an option.

>  RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PARAM_STRING(net_cpfl,
>       CPFL_TX_SINGLE_Q "=<0|1> "
>       CPFL_RX_SINGLE_Q "=<0|1> "
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.h 
> b/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.h
> index d4e1176ab1..2cfcdd6206 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
>  
>  /* Device IDs */
>  #define IDPF_DEV_ID_CPF                      0x1453
> +#define IXD_DEV_ID_VCPF                      0x1203
>  #define VIRTCHNL2_QUEUE_GROUP_P2P    0x100
>  

I see the same device id added twice, once in cpfl and once in idpf
drivers. Can the cpfl driver re-use the definition from idpf_common_device
and save duplication?

>  #define CPFL_HOST_ID_NUM     2
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.c 
> b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.c
> index ff1fbcd2b4..8c637a2fb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ idpf_init_mbx(struct idpf_hw *hw)
>       struct idpf_ctlq_info *ctlq;
>       int ret = 0;
>  
> -     if (hw->device_id == IDPF_DEV_ID_SRIOV)
> +     if (hw->device_id == IDPF_DEV_ID_SRIOV || hw->device_id == 
> IXD_DEV_ID_VCPF)
>               ret = idpf_ctlq_init(hw, IDPF_CTLQ_NUM, vf_ctlq_info);
>       else
>               ret = idpf_ctlq_init(hw, IDPF_CTLQ_NUM, pf_ctlq_info);
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ idpf_adapter_init(struct idpf_adapter *adapter)
>       struct idpf_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
>       int ret;
>  
> -     if (hw->device_id == IDPF_DEV_ID_SRIOV) {
> +     if (hw->device_id == IDPF_DEV_ID_SRIOV || hw->device_id == 
> IXD_DEV_ID_VCPF) {
>               ret = idpf_check_vf_reset_done(hw);
>       } else {
>               idpf_reset_pf(hw);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.h 
> b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.h
> index 5f3e4a4fcf..d536ce7e15 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include "idpf_common_logs.h"
>  
>  #define IDPF_DEV_ID_SRIOV    0x145C
> +#define IXD_DEV_ID_VCPF         0x1203
>  
>  #define IDPF_RSS_KEY_LEN     52
>  
> -- 
> 2.37.3
> 

Reply via email to