On Thu,  9 Oct 2025 16:46:29 +0530
[email protected] wrote:

>  
> +struct enetc_msg_swbd {
> +     void *vaddr;
> +     uint64_t dma;
> +     int size;
> +};
> +

Do you really want 'size' to be signed value.
Wouldn't uint32_t or size_t be better here.

Reply via email to