Le jeu. 6 nov. 2025, 20:29, Stephen Hemminger
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 22:08:06 +0530
Hemant Agrawal <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> +static void
> +dpaa2_clear_queue_active_dps(struct dpaa2_queue *q, int num_lcores)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_lcores; i++) {
> + struct queue_storage_info_t *qs = q->q_storage[i];
> +
> + if (!qs)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (qs->active_dqs) {
> + clear_swp_active_dqs(qs->active_dpio_id);
> + qs->active_dqs = NULL;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
Why not use RTE_LCORE_FOREACH() here?
For the loop, I did it the same way as in dpaa2_queue_storage_alloc(), to stay
aligned with the rest of the driver instead of using RTE_LCORE_FOREACH().
Thanks Hemant for upstreaming my patch. However, you added my email in .mailmap
as a new entry — it should instead be added as a second email under the
existing Maxime Leroy entry.
[Hemant]
Will send v2
