> To prevent confusion as to whether operations with them will be executed > as signed or unsigned (and with what bit width) mark all ARM opcode > constants with UINT32_C. > > Signed-off-by: Marat Khalili <[email protected]> > --- Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <[email protected]> > -- > 2.43.0
- RE: [PATCH v2 3/5] bpf: disallow empty program Marat Khalili
- [PATCH v2 4/5] bpf: make add/subtract one program valid... Marat Khalili
- [PATCH v2 5/5] bpf: fix BPF validation w/ conditional j... Marat Khalili
- [PATCH v3 0/6] bpf: simple tests and fixes Marat Khalili
- [PATCH v3 1/6] eal: variable first arguments of RT... Marat Khalili
- RE: [PATCH v3 1/6] eal: variable first argumen... Konstantin Ananyev
- [PATCH v3 2/6] bpf: fix signed shift overflows in ... Marat Khalili
- RE: [PATCH v3 2/6] bpf: fix signed shift overf... Konstantin Ananyev
- [PATCH v3 4/6] bpf: disallow empty program Marat Khalili
- [PATCH v3 3/6] bpf: mark ARM opcodes with UINT32_C Marat Khalili
- RE: [PATCH v3 3/6] bpf: mark ARM opcodes with ... Konstantin Ananyev
- [PATCH v3 5/6] bpf: make add/subtract one program ... Marat Khalili
- [PATCH v3 6/6] bpf: fix BPF validation w/ conditio... Marat Khalili
