On 2/16/2026 5:58 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 10:26:12AM +0000, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
The macros used were not informative and did not add any value beyond code
golf, so remove them and make MAC type checks explicit.
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 12 ------------
drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h
b/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h
index 5dbd659941..7dc02a472b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h
@@ -137,18 +137,6 @@
#define IXGBE_MAX_FDIR_FILTER_NUM (1024 * 32)
#define IXGBE_MAX_L2_TN_FILTER_NUM 128
-#define MAC_TYPE_FILTER_SUP_EXT(type) do {\
- if ((type) != ixgbe_mac_82599EB && (type) != ixgbe_mac_X540)\
- return -ENOTSUP;\
-} while (0)
-
-#define MAC_TYPE_FILTER_SUP(type) do {\
- if ((type) != ixgbe_mac_82599EB && (type) != ixgbe_mac_X540 &&\
- (type) != ixgbe_mac_X550 && (type) != ixgbe_mac_X550EM_x &&\
- (type) != ixgbe_mac_X550EM_a && (type) != ixgbe_mac_E610)\
- return -ENOTSUP;\
-} while (0)
-
Ack for removing the former. For the latter, since the list is longer and
the code is used twice, I'd be tempted to convert to an inline function
taking in struct hw and returning type bool. WDYT?
I don't want to use a macro/inline function just to save on code, it has
to have some semantic meaning. Do you have any suggestions on what it is
that we'd be checking in these cases?
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
