Sriram, I am glad the patch worked for you. Unfortunately, I am no longer working in this space so you will need to take the lead on getting this pulled in.
-MikeB On Mon, Mar 16, 2026, 1:50 AM Sriram Yagnaraman < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Do you know the status of this patch? It looks like it hasn't received any > review since it was posted in January 2025. > > We've independently hit the same bug (dst_off reset per-descriptor > instead of per-packet in the RX slow path) and your fix solves our > issue. > > If this patch is stale and unlikely to be picked up, I can send a > new patchset against the latest tree that also includes a > boundary check for MEMIF_DESC_FLAG_NEXT when n_slots is > exhausted. > > Let me know if you'd prefer to respin your series or if I should send > a new one. > > Thanks, > Sriram >
