On 3/23/26 10:52 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> The close operation was never closing probed devices.
>
> Taking a step back, reevaluating the devargs makes no sense during the
> close step, as a probed device must have passed the allow/block list
> evaluation initially.
>
> Since the device contains a reference to the driver that probed it,
> simply call this driver remove op.
>
> Fixes: 274fd921ff7f ("bus/fslmc: support close operation")
> Cc: [email protected]
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/bus/fslmc/fslmc_vfio.c | 21 ++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/fslmc/fslmc_vfio.c b/drivers/bus/fslmc/fslmc_vfio.c
> index 550d4e0e8d..7daa18d850 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/fslmc/fslmc_vfio.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/fslmc/fslmc_vfio.c
> @@ -1393,7 +1393,7 @@ fslmc_close_iodevices(struct rte_dpaa2_device *dev,
> {
> struct rte_dpaa2_object *object = NULL;
> struct rte_dpaa2_driver *drv;
> - int ret, probe_all;
> + int ret;
>
> switch (dev->dev_type) {
> case DPAA2_IO:
> @@ -1411,22 +1411,9 @@ fslmc_close_iodevices(struct rte_dpaa2_device *dev,
> case DPAA2_ETH:
> case DPAA2_CRYPTO:
> case DPAA2_QDMA:
> - probe_all = rte_fslmc_bus.bus.conf.scan_mode !=
> - RTE_BUS_SCAN_ALLOWLIST;
> - TAILQ_FOREACH(drv, &rte_fslmc_bus.driver_list, next) {
> - if (drv->drv_type != dev->dev_type)
> - continue;
> - if (rte_dev_is_probed(&dev->device))
> - continue;
> - if (probe_all ||
> - (dev->device.devargs &&
> - dev->device.devargs->policy ==
> - RTE_DEV_ALLOWED)) {
> - ret = drv->remove(dev);
> - if (ret)
> - DPAA2_BUS_ERR("Unable to remove");
> - }
> - }
> + drv = dev->driver;
> + if (drv && drv->remove && drv->remove(dev))
Not new but dpaa2_qdma_remove doesn't return an error which seems like a
bug, but it has it's own log and it's just a log here anyway, so not
critical.
> + DPAA2_BUS_ERR("Unable to remove");
> break;
> default:
> break;
