On 08/25/2016 05:03 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:11:57AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >> >> >> On 08/18/2016 10:48 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: >>> No need to use a pointer to store/retrieve features. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com> >>> --- >>> lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 20 ++++++++------------ >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c >>> index ef4a0c1..eee99e9 100644 >>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c >>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c >>> @@ -155,23 +155,22 @@ vhost_user_reset_owner(struct virtio_net *dev) >>> /* >>> * The features that we support are requested. >>> */ >>> -static int >>> -vhost_user_get_features(uint64_t *pu) >>> +static uint64_t >>> +vhost_user_get_features(void) >>> { >>> - *pu = VHOST_FEATURES; >>> - return 0; >>> + return VHOST_FEATURES; >>> } >> >> This is not the topic of this series, but I wonder if it >> could make sense to be able to override supported features >> at device init time. > > Not quite sure I understood it correctly: is rte_vhost_feature_disable() > the answer you are looking for? Not really.
I meant a per-device supported features, and something you could set also via the vhost PMD options, without needing to recompile. But maybe it would make more sense to do it a guest level? Maxime