Hello All, Can you please review the change and let me know if any comments. I would like to push this patch to 16.07 release. Thanks
Regards Suyash Karmarkar -----Original Message----- From: Karmarkar Suyash Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 9:27 AM To: rsanford at akamai.com Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Karmarkar Suyash <skarmarkar at sonusnet.com> Subject: [PATCH v1]:rte_timer:timer lag issue correction For Periodic timers ,if the lag gets introduced, the current code added additional delay when the next peridoc timer was initialized by not taking into account the delay added, with this fix the code would start the next occurrence of timer keeping in account the lag added.Corrected the behavior. Fixes:rte_timer: timer lag issue Karmarkar Suyash (1): Signed-off-by: Karmarkar Suyash <skarmarkar at sonusnet.com<mailto:skarmarkar at sonusnet.com>> lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) From ba885531ac26af1aabc6bd0f58d7ce744b04acf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karmarkar Suyash <skarmarkar at sonusnet.com<mailto:skarmar...@sonusnet.com>> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:20:37 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v1] Signed-off-by: Karmarkar Suyash <skarmarkar at sonusnet.com<mailto:skarmarkar at sonusnet.com>> --- lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c b/lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c index 43da836..18782fa 100644 --- a/lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c +++ b/lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c @@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ void rte_timer_manage(void) status.owner = (int16_t)lcore_id; rte_wmb(); tim->status.u32 = status.u32; - __rte_timer_reset(tim, cur_time + tim->period, + __rte_timer_reset(tim, tim->expire + tim->period, tim->period, lcore_id, tim->f, tim->arg, 1); rte_spinlock_unlock(&priv_timer[lcore_id].list_lock); } -- 2.9.3.windows.1
