> 
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2026 at 02:11, Long Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The EAL hotplug multi-process messaging uses a fixed-size buffer
> > (EAL_DEV_MP_DEV_ARGS_MAX_LEN, 128 bytes) for device arguments.
> > When devargs exceeds this limit, strlcpy silently truncates the
> > string. This causes secondary processes to receive incomplete devargs
> > during hotplug re-add, leading to failed port re-initialization.
> >
> > For example, a MANA PCI device with 6 mac= arguments:
> >
> >   mac=AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:01,mac=AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:02,
> >   mac=AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:03,mac=AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:04,
> >   mac=AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:05,mac=AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:06
> >
> > produces a 131-byte devargs string that gets silently truncated to 127
> > bytes, losing the last MAC address.
> >
> > Return -E2BIG from rte_dev_probe() when devargs would be truncated,
> > instead of silently corrupting data. rte_dev_remove() does not need
> > the same check because the length was already validated at probe time.
> >
> > Fixes: 244d5130719c ("eal: enable hotplug on multi-process")
> > Cc: [email protected]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Long Li <[email protected]>
> 
> Re-reading the function, I have one concern about the fix.
> 
> I agree there is a bug with multiprocess.
> But this change here also imposes a limit to 128 that was not there before,
> even if multiprocess is disabled.
> It may not be a big problem, but we are calling the the multi process
> machinerie when unneeded (it ends up with a ENOTSUP).
> 
> I sent a small patch on this topic, could you have a look please?

Thank you. I sent a review comment. This patch looks good.

I'll modify this patch to have the length check inside if (do_mp) block.

Long

> 
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Finbox.
> dpdk.org%2Fdev%2F20260625072254.4190227-1-
> david.marchand%40redhat.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Clongli%40microsoft.c
> om%7Cf1cf337c1f014cc8b83b08ded28ab9d4%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd
> 011db47%7C1%7C0%7C639179690431011725%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3
> d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOI
> joiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7otoCpQbXZvcj5tSD
> QAJ77sdfu8U%2BgPwZZyYeTC%2F2lw%3D&reserved=0
> 
> 
> --
> David Marchand

Reply via email to