Prashant Gupta <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > Can Somebody please guide for this case? > Thanks in advance !
Depends on was merged in upstream patchwork some time ago, but the release hasn't come out with it yet. IOL Depends-on support relies on this feature being provided by patchwork. > Regards, > Prashant > > > NXP Confidential > -----Original Message----- > From: Prashant Gupta > Sent: 16 September 2026 14:57 > To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' > <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' > <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Hemant Agrawal <[email protected]> > Subject: Issue with patch application (Depends-on ignored) - pw169600-169609 > > Hi UNH-IOL CI Team, > > I received an apply patch failure warning for patch set 169600-169609 > (Series > 39292). > (https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2026-September/1044522.html) > > The build failed because it tried to apply directly to origin/main, > resulting in a conflict inside > drivers/dma/dpaa2/dpaa2_qdma.c. However, this series strictly depends > on my previous series 39291 ("net/dpaa2: flow, meter and parser > features"), which contains the base infrastructure changes. > > I included a "Depends-on" tag in the cover letter to handle this > sequence, but the CI bot seems to have missed or skipped > it. > (https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/[email protected]/) > (Depends-on: series-39291 ("net/dpaa2: flow, meter and parser features")) > > > Could you please help me check if there was a parsing issue with the > tag layout, or if I need to format the dependency tag differently so > the lab bots can chain these series automatically? > > Regards, > Prashant Gupta
