26/10/2026 21:09, Roman Khromenok: > Hello, > > Gentle ping on this RFC for 27.03. > > I would like to agree on the direction before working on the next > step, CMIS decoding, which I plan to add to this library. The open > points are in the cover letter: > > 1. The library name: "transceiver" or "xcvr".
"transceiver" reads better, but "xcvr" is shorter. I cannot decide. > 2. Whether rte_eth_module_eeprom_parse() stays as a wrapper > or is deprecated in favor of rte_transceiver_decode(). rte_eth_module_eeprom_parse() is experimental so it can be removed.
