2016-02-23 16:17, Kobylinski, MichalX: > Hi Thomas, > I sent in January a patch-set that extends to 24 bits a next_hop field in lpm > library: > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10249/ > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10250/ > > also Jerin Jakob sent his patch-set with ARM architecture support in lpm > library. > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10478/ > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10479/ > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10480/ > > Could you write please, in which order do you prefer to apply these two > patch-sets? > This information will be helpful to predict the risk and estimate additional > work.
Thanks for bringing up the LPM patches. I would prefer to follow the advice of Bruce who has well followed these interactions.
