Hi Hanoch, On 01/05/2016 12:11 PM, Hanoch Haim (hhaim) wrote: > Hi Oliver, > Thank you for the fast response and it would be great to open a discussion on > that. > In general our project can leverage your optimization and I think it is great > (we should have thought about it) . We can use it using the workaround I > described. > However, for me it seems odd that rte_pktmbuf_attach () that does not > *change* anything in m_const, except of the *atomic* ref counter does not > work in parallel. > The example I gave is a classic use case of rte_pktmbuf_attach (multicast ) > and I don't see why it wouldn't work after your optimization. > > Do you have a pointer to the documentation that state that that you can't > call the atomic ref counter from more than one thread?
Unfortunately it's not documented yet, but it's something we should better describe. Regards, Olivier
