> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 10:33 AM > To: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara at intel.com> > Cc: Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pattan at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 5/8] pdump: add new library for packet > capturing support > > > Also, it makes it a bit harder for the documentation maintainer (me in > this case) to see doc changes within patches and to ack just the doc part. > From a documentation maintainer point of view it would be best to have > any, non-trivial, doc changes in a separate patch. > > I understand your concern. > But you cannot assume every doc changes will be properly highlighted in > the headline. I think you need to filter patches based on a content > pattern: > +++ b/doc/guides/
Hi Thomas, That still leaves the issue of not being able to ack the doc part of the patch separately from the rest of the patch. John
