Hi Bruce, > -----Original Message----- > From: Richardson, Bruce > Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 6:14 PM > To: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu at intel.com> > Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] i40e: configure MTU > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 03:23:43PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 01:33:42AM +0000, Wu, Jingjing wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Xing, Beilei > > > > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 11:17 PM > > > > To: Wu, Jingjing > > > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei > > > > Subject: [PATCH v4] i40e: configure MTU > > > > > > > > This patch enables configuring MTU for i40e. > > > > Since changing MTU needs to reconfigure queue, stop port first > > > > before configuring MTU. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing at intel.com> > > > > > > Acked-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu at intel.com> > > > > > Applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_07 > > > > /Bruce > > It has been brought to my attention that there were still outstanding comments > and issues with v3 of the patch that were never resolved, therefore this patch > may need to be reverted, as I should not have applied it > > Maintainers, please do not ack patches for your components if there are still > unresolved discussion on them! Once the component maintainer acks a patch I > should not have to go back through the whole patch history to determine if it > can > be applied or not. >
Sorry for inconvenience. But here's one correction, this v4 patch is acked and applied on May 23, but v3 comments are added June 17, I think Jingjing always is a responsible maintainer :) > Regards, > /Bruce