2016-06-29 14:55, Bruce Richardson: > The mempool_count and mempool_free_count behaved contrary to what their > names suggested. The free_count function actually returned the number of > elements that were allocated from the pool, not the number unallocated as > the name implied. > > Fix this by introducing two new functions to replace the old ones, > * rte_mempool_unallocated_count to replace rte_mempool_count > * rte_mempool_allocated_count to replace rte_mempool_free_count
What about available/used instead of unallocated/allocated?
