As found in rte_lpm6_free the two lpm interfaces rte_lpm_free_v20 and rte_lpm_free_v1604 had a leak.
rte_lpm_free_v20 might have missed to free rules_tbl rte_lpm_free_v1604 due to an early exit might have missed to free rules_tbl and lpm itself. Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com> --- lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c index d21c783..e8fe33e 100644 --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c @@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ rte_lpm_free_v20(struct rte_lpm_v20 *lpm) rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_free(lpm->rules_tbl); rte_free(lpm); rte_free(te); } @@ -392,15 +393,12 @@ rte_lpm_free_v1604(struct rte_lpm *lpm) if (te->data == (void *) lpm) break; } - if (te == NULL) { - rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); - return; - } - - TAILQ_REMOVE(lpm_list, te, next); + if (te != NULL) + TAILQ_REMOVE(lpm_list, te, next); rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_free(lpm->rules_tbl); rte_free(lpm); rte_free(te); } -- 2.7.0