On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:03:51 +0000 "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan at intel.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen > > > >Hemminger > > > >Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 1:38 AM > > > >To: dev at dpdk.org > > > >Cc: Mike Davison <mdavison at brocade.com>; Stephen Hemminger > > > ><shemming at brocade.com> > > > >Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mbuf: Add rte_pktmbuf_copy > > > > > > > >From: Stephen Hemminger <shemming at brocade.com> > > > > > > > >Added rte_pktmbuf_copy() function since copying multi-part segments > > > >is common issue and can be problematic. > > > > > > > >Signed-off-by: Mike Davison <mdavison at brocade.com> > > > >Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemming at brocade.com> > > > >--- > > > > > > Hi Stephen :> > > > This patch look useful in case of backup buffs. > > > There will be second approach ? > > > > I did bother resubmitting it since unless there are users in current code > > base it > > would likely rot. > > I was writing similar mbuf copy functionality which is required for tcpdump > feature. > But, It was brought to my notice that this patch with similar functionality > already exists, so I would like to take this patch and work on further. > Also, if you have any further code changes on this patch, would you please > send the latest one. I will work further. > > Thanks, > Reshma We have a newer version that handles different size pools.