> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Christian Ehrhardt > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 9:07 AM > To: dev <dev at dpdk.org>; Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Suggestions for the dpdk stable tree > > Hi, > I guess over time/releases less people mind the 2.2-stable. > But I still see a lot of people referring to 2.2 - so why not giving this > thread a ping again. > > ack / nack / opinions ?
Hi Christian, We are interested in having a LTS/Stable tree. We have been looking at identifying a maintainer and validation engineer internally to support the effort but haven't be able to finalize that. Once we do we will come back to the mailing list with a proposal and a request for comments. We would probably be looking at 16.04 or even 16.07 as the basis for the LTS at this stage. It would be great if we could get support from you or others as well. John. --
