> > It's true that users can patch around this problem (and I started off doing > just that), but why impose this inconvenience on users when DPDK > can just "do the right thing" to begin with? For example, it took me several > hours to figure out why the problem was occurring and then to > hunt down the --file-prefix solution. Is there some reason why it would be a > bad idea to fix this in DPDK?
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: avoid unnecessary conflicts ov... John Ousterhout
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: avoid unnecessary conflic... Ananyev, Konstantin
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: avoid unnecessary con... John Ousterhout
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: avoid unnecessary... Van Haaren, Harry
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: avoid unneces... John Ousterhout
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: avoid un... Van Haaren, Harry
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: avoi... Stephen Hemminger
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: avoid un... Thomas Monjalon
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: avoid unnecessary... Ananyev, Konstantin
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: avoid unnecessary con... Tahhan, Maryam
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: avoid unnecessary... John Ousterhout