From: yingzhi [mailto:kai...@qq.com]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 6:39 PM
To: Zhang, Helin
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: RE: [dpdk-dev] rte_kni_tx_burst() hangs because of no
freedescriptors
Hi Helin,
Thanks for your response, to answer your questions:
1. we send only one packet each time calling rte_kni_tx_burst(), which means
the last argument is 1.
2. it returns 0 because the free mbuf function inside tx_burst will not free
any mbuf:
if (txq->nb_tx_free < txq->tx_free_thresh)
ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(txq);
after this operation, the txq->nb_tx_free is not increased and keeps to be "0"
eventually.
I did some tests today, I commented out this section of ixgbe_rxtx_vec_common.h
-> ixgbe_tx_free_bufs
status = txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].wb.status;
if (!(status & IXGBE_ADVTXD_STAT_DD))
return 0;
After ignoring DD bit check, our app runs for about 6 hours without issue. I
suspect there is something wrong in my program set the DD bit somewhere. One of
the possible cause currently I suspect is as far as I know,
rte_pktmbuf_free(mbuf.array[k]) will free the mbuf of the packet and any
fragmented packets following by it. But in our application such as below code
snippet:
auto nb_tx = rte_eth_tx_burst(port, queue, mbuf.array, (uint16_t)
nb_rx);
if (unlikely(nb_tx < nb_rx)) {
for (unsigned k = nb_tx; k < nb_rx; k++) {
rte_pktmbuf_free(mbuf.array[k]);
}
}
[Zhang, Helin] it seems above code piece has memory leak, if the buffer is
chained. After all memory leaked, then the issue comes. Please try to check if
this is the root cause!
In this case if there are fragmented packets and failed transmission, may cause
a mbuf be freed multiple times.
Above is just my suspect, need to do some tests later today or tomorrow.
Thanks
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Zhang, Helin";<helin.zh...@intel.com>;
Date: Mon, Oct 24, 2016 11:33 AM
To: "yingzhi"<kaitoy at qq.com>;
Cc: "dev at dpdk.org"<dev at dpdk.org>;
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] rte_kni_tx_burst() hangs because of no freedescriptors
Hi Yingzhi
Thank you for the reporting! The description is not so clear at least for me.
Please help to narrown down the issue by youself.
How many packets would it have for calling TX function?
Why it would return 0 after calling TX function? No memory? Or return from
else? Have you found anything?
Regards,
Helin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org]<mailto:[mailto:dev-bounces at
> dpdk.org]> On Behalf Of yingzhi
> Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2016 9:30 PM
> To: users; dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] rte_kni_tx_burst() hangs because of no free descriptors
>
> -
> Hi Experts,
>
> Background:
>
> We are using DPDK to develop a LoadBalancer following below logic: When
> a new packet is received:
> 1. if the dst_addr is management IP, forward to KNI. 2. if the dst_addr is in
> VIP list, select backend and forward(modify dst mac address). 3. otherwise
> drop the packet.
>
> At this stage, we use one single thread for KNI forwarding and another for
> VIP forwarding(forward to eth).
>
> DPDK version: 16.07
> NIC: 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection
> Linux: 14.04.1-Ubuntu x64
>
> Promblem description:
>
> The program runs correctly for sometime(around 2 hours for 400Mb traffic).
> But it it will hang. When problem happens, rte_eth_tx_burst() will not able to
> send out any packets(always returns 0). We tracked into that function and
> noticed it is actually calling ixgbe driver's ixgbe_xmit_pkts_vec() function
> in
> our environment, because we use default tx queue configuration, after
> printing some info, we found if the free function works fine:
> tx_rs_thresh: 32, tx_free_thresh: 32, nb_tx_free: 31
>
> it will trigger free and make 32 more free descriptors:
> tx_rs_thresh: 32, tx_free_thresh: 32, nb_tx_free: 62
>
> but when something going wrong, it will no longer free anything:
> tx_rs_thresh: 32, tx_free_thresh: 32, nb_tx_free: 0 tx_rs_thresh: 32,
> tx_free_thresh: 32, nb_tx_free: 0
>
> It may related with the DD flag of the descriptor but we are not quite sure.
>
> Our program logic:
>
> create two mbuf pools on socket 0, one for rx_queue and one for kni. (all
> lcore threads runs on socket0)
>
> init kni interface with rte_kni_alloc()
>
>
> init one NIC interface with
> rte_eth_dev_configure(); rte_eth_rx_queue_setup();
> rte_eth_tx_queue_setup(); rte_eth_dev_start();
>
>
>
> in the eth main loop: (code is simplified)
> while(1) { n = rte_eth_rx_burst(packets); for (i = 0; i < n; ++i)
> { if
> (SEND_TO_KNI) { m = rte_kni_tx_burst(packets[i]); if
> (m != 1))
> { rte_pktmbuf_free(packets[i]); } }
> if (SEND_TO_ETH)
> { // after modify the packet m =
> rte_eth_tx_burst(packets[i]);
> if (m != 1)) { rte_pktmbuf_free(packets[i]); }
> } //
> otherwise drop the packet rte_pktmbuf_free(packets[i]); } }
>
>
> Please advise if I'm using DPDK in a wrong way. Sorry if I missed something
> basic, I'm new to DPDK.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Best regards
