Yes, this we can do without asking you guys, and we already do so. But that is 
not what this ntnic PMD is about.
We have built a NT NIC out of our existing accelerator products. This NIC is 
built using an FPGA and is targeted towards NFV acceleration in virtualized 
environments. Now, we have seen good acceleration results in our tests by using 
DPDK (with small additions to DPDK). What we want to do is to make this part of 
open source DPDK and in general run this project in an open source spirit.
We want to make further RFCs to the DPDK community about extensions to the DPDK 
that can accelerate packet processing, and this ntnic PMD is the first step in 
our participation/contribution into the DPDK project.
Furthermore, we do not think in proprietary code with this project, and no 
further libraries or other external closed source dependencies will be added in 
upcoming contributions from our side (at least we have no plan in doing so).

Finn

From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: 10. september 2016 20:31
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Finn Christensen <fc at napatech.com>; Neil Horman 
<nhorman at tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ntnic: add PMD driver


I think that if the driver is just a shim for proprietary code, then the vendor 
should just maintain it out of tree. 6wind and windriver already do this.

Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it may contain 
confidential information intended for the addressee(s) only. The information is 
not to be surrendered or copied to unauthorized persons. If you have received 
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete 
this e-mail from your system.

Reply via email to