2016-09-15 14:02, Hunt, David: > On 9/9/2016 9:43 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > > +static inline > > +struct rte_intr_handle *eth_dev_get_intr_handle(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > > +{ > > + if (dev->pci_dev) { > > + return &dev->pci_dev->intr_handle; > > + } > > + > > + RTE_VERIFY(0); > > Rather than RTE_VERIFY(0), might I suggest using rte_panic with a more > relevant error message?
RTE_ASSERT is preferred. We must stop adding some rte_panic calls except for debug.