> -----Original Message----- > From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 6:30 AM > To: Mcnamara, John <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Yang, Zhiyong <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: introduce PVP reference benchmark > > > > On 12/07/2016 10:07 PM, Mcnamara, John wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 12:25 PM > >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Mcnamara, > >> John <[email protected]>; Yang, Zhiyong > >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] > >> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <[email protected]> > >> Subject: [PATCH v2] doc: introduce PVP reference benchmark > >> > >> Having reference benchmarks is important in order to obtain > >> reproducible performance figures. > >> > >> This patch describes required steps to configure a PVP setup using > >> testpmd in both host and guest. > >> > >> Not relying on external vSwitch ease integration in a CI loop by not > >> being impacted by DPDK API changes. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <[email protected]> > > > > There is one trailing whitespace warning but apart from that: > > > > Acked-by: John McNamara <[email protected]> > > Thanks John, > > Do you want me to send a v3, fixing the trailing whitespace & collecting > the acks? > > -- Maxime
No need (unless the tree maintainer says otherwise). It was one trailing whitespace. Just something to look out for in future. P.S., We both should have truncated the text in this mail before replying. :-/ http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/17704/
